So Michael Jones, an art critic writing for the Guardian has said that Photography isn’t as worthy an art form as painting and doesn’t belong on a gallery wall.I was going to type up a long response but Michael Dooney has beaten me to it and said everything I wanted to say, which is just that Jones is lazy.
Yes there is lots of bad photography that isn’t art (but thinks it is) but I don’t believe that good photographers set out to emulate painting any more than good TV producers set out to emulate cinema. Does watching TV give you the same depth of experience as cinema viewing. Maybe not in the sense of scale and awe that cinema can attain but TV is every bit as powerful when focused on what it does well. Great TV drama is every bit as important as great cinema and great photographs are every bit as important as great paintings.
Picking examples of bad photography and claiming they prove that Photography isn’t worthy as an art form doesn’t prove Jonathan Jones’ argument, it just proves he is a lazy journalist.
Related posts & pages
Rugby double header
Time for some fun from the lower leagues with a double header at Sandy Bay ...read more
Rugby - HKU Wizards vs DB Pirates
HKU Wizards vs DB PiratesSaturday 3rd December saw the Hong Kong University Wizards take on ...read more
Premier League Rugby - HK Scottish vs HK Cricket Club
Saturday 5th November saw Bloomberg Hong Kong Scottish take on Herbert Smith Freehills Hong Kong ...read more
Rugby - HKU Freshmen vs Societe Generale Valley Mai Jais
Saturday 29th October saw University Hong Kong University Freshmen vs Societe Generale Valley Mai Jais ...read more